Mousa A et al., Nature Communications - Pooled analysis of seven therapeutic efficacy trials (1639 participants, 12 African sites) quantifies how dhps resistance genotypes shorten the duration of protection from sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) and maps predicted chemoprevention impact across Africa. Key terms: sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, dhps mutations, chemoprevention, malaria, genomic surveillance.
Study Highlights:
The authors pooled individual-level data from seven trials (1639 participants) and used a Bayesian multi-strain Weibull survival model to estimate genotype-specific durations of SP protection while accounting for site-level transmission. Mean protection against sulfadoxine-susceptible dhps AKA parasites was longest (≈55.7 days), intermediate for dhps GKA (≈33.9 days), and substantially shorter for dhps GEA (≈10.7 days) and dhps GEG (≈11.7 days). SP combined with amodiaquine (SPAQ) showed markedly longer protection against GEA in the available data (≈42.5 days). The study produced maps and a web tool to predict local SP protective efficacy using genomic surveillance inputs.
Conclusion:
dhps resistance mutations substantially reduce the duration of SP post-treatment protection; integrating genotype surveillance into policy can guide where SP-based chemoprevention is likely to remain effective and where alternatives such as SPAQ should be considered.
QC:
This episode was checked against the original article PDF and publication metadata for the episode release published on 2025-05-16.
QC Scope:
- article metadata and core scientific claims from the narration
- excludes analogies, intro/outro, and music
QC Summary:
- factual score: 10/10
- metadata score: 10/10
- supported core claims: 6
- claims flagged for review: 0
- metadata checks passed: 4
- metadata issues found: 0
Metadata Audited:
- article_doi
- article_title
- article_journal
- license
Factual Items Audited:
- SP protection duration varies by dhps genotype; longest against sulfadoxine-susceptible AKA parasites (~55.7–56 days) and shorter for GKA (~33.9 days), GEA (~10.7 days), and GEG (~
- SPAQ (SP + amodiaquine) provides markedly longer protection against GEA than SP alone, with ~42.5 days versus ~10.7 days for SP alone.
- Validation with IPTi trials showed model predictions closely matched observed reinfection rates, supporting generalizability of genotype-specific protection estimates.
- A web-based tool was developed to predict SP protective efficacy based on local dhps genotype frequencies, enabling policy tailoring.
- Across sub-Saharan Africa, 30-day protective efficacy against infection varies from about 59% to 92%, with a mean of approximately 4.7 clinical malaria cases averted per 100 childr
- Policy implications: strategies should be tailored to local resistance patterns, using molecular surveillance to guide where SP is effective and where alternatives (e.g., SPAQ) sho
QC result: Pass.
Fler avsnitt av Base by Base
Visa alla avsnitt av Base by BaseBase by Base med Gustavo Barra finns tillgänglig på flera plattformar. Informationen på denna sida kommer från offentliga podd-flöden.
