On the politics of consultancy [Patreon Exclusive. Sign up @ patreon.com/bungacast] The past 40 years have seen a whole range of things the state used to do itself outsourced to third parties. Now there is a turn against these practices. But can the state actually get stuff done, or is it doomed for its prior reliance on consultants? It's not just the left the criticises outsourcing - the right now does too. How do these positions differ? And how are these questions related to another critique – that of 'bullshit jobs'? Readings & Links:
- In Clover, Laleh Khalili, LRB (attached)
- The Big Con — the case against consultancies (review of Mazzucatto & Collington), Diane Coyle, FT (attached)
- Letter: Groundless assertions about a trusted profession (response from a consultant), FT
- How PwC captured Australia, Shahar Hameiri, Unherd
- Consultancies Have Been the Handmaidens of Neoliberalism, Nathan Akehurst, Jacobin
- Radical Centrism: Uniting the Radical Left and the Radical Right, Ashwin Parameswaran, Macroresilience
- The limits of government outsourcing, Martin Bortz, Pursuit
- /267/ South Africa Mafia State ft. Benjamin Fogel
Fler avsnitt av Bungacast
Visa alla avsnitt av BungacastBungacast med Bungacast finns tillgänglig på flera plattformar. Informationen på denna sida kommer från offentliga podd-flöden.
