Critical Magic Theory: An Analytical Harry Potter Podcast

In this Prof Responds episode of Critical Magic Theory, Professor Julian Wamble dives into the dazzling disaster that is Gilderoy Lockhart—our favorite fame-chasing fraud.

From his misuse of memory charms to his obsession with applause over competence, this episode unpacks your brilliant post-episode chat insights and tackles the deeper themes of image, power, and performance. Is Lockhart just a punchline, or is he something more sinister? What does his pretty privilege reveal about the Wizarding World’s gullibility? And most importantly, is he actually a good Ravenclaw? 

Along the way, we explore the ethics of memory charms (spoiler: it’s dark), compare Lockhart’s influence to real-world influencers and tech bros, and ask what villainy looks like when it’s hiding behind great hair and a charming smile. Lockhart may be incompetent in some ways, but as this episode reveals—he’s dangerously good at playing dumb.

What would you do to be remembered?

This week on Critical Magic Theory, Professor Julian Wamble dives deep into the shimmering shallows of Gilderoy Lockhart—a man so desperate for legacy, he obliterated others’ lives just to make space for his own myth. From vanity and fraudulence to memory charms and moral delusion, we interrogate what happens when someone builds their identity entirely on lies—and worse, starts believing them.

Is Lockhart a villain? A bad Ravenclaw? Just a glorified PR stunt with good hair? Join us as we unpack the performance of fame, the ethics of memory, and why silence might be the most dangerous thing of all. Also: Beyoncé, colonialism, and why Lockhart’s story might be the Wizarding World’s most damning metaphor.

Special thanks to our new Patreon Deep Diver: Grace

What do maternal tropes, mediocre men, and magical possession all have in common?

In this "Prof Responses" episode, Professor Julian Wamble returns to unpack the post-episode chats on two very different figures: Minerva McGonagall and Quirinus Quirrell.
 
Was McGonagall really written as a maternal figure—or have we reimagined her to reflect a world Rowling couldn’t envision? And what do we do with Quirrell, a Ravenclaw who might’ve been smart enough to find Voldemort but foolish enough to wear him like a backpack?
 
From challenging the “mom or mess” dichotomy to breaking down the blurry lines between agency and possession, this episode dives into how fandom, canon, and cultural context shape the way we read these characters. And yes, favoritism, ambition, and the overconfidence of mediocre white men all make an appearance.
 
As always, stay critical while keeping it magical! 

What if the villain wasn’t overtaken—but offered himself up?
 
In this episode of Critical Magic Theory, Professor Julian Wamble dives into the sweaty, stammering chaos of Professor Quirrell—and the dangerous audacity that lies beneath it. Often remembered as little more than a jittery man in a turban, Quirrell is actually one of the clearest cautionary tales in the Wizarding World: a man who gave Voldemort room on the back of his head in exchange for the illusion of power. From Ravenclaw ego to radical insecurity, we unpack what happens when ambition meets delusion—and why Quirrell might not be possessed, but willing.
 
Plus, a warm welcome to our newest Patreon Deep Divers: Addy, Rachel, and Nicole! Your support keeps this world spinning and these conversations growing—thank you for diving deep with us.

Be on the lookout for the Lockhart survey! 

Til then, be critical and stay magical my friends! 

“She was watching the Dursleys all day while everyone else celebrated—and somehow, we still expect more from her.”
 
In this episode of Critical Magic Theory, we take a long-overdue deep dive into the one and only Minerva McGonagall. Often admired for her strength, fairness, and dry wit, McGonagall is seen by many as the model of a good teacher, a good Gryffindor, and a good person. But what happens when we start asking whether those expectations are fair—or even possible?

We unpack how patriarchy and pureblood supremacy shaped her life, how the fandom has turned her into a presumed infallable fantasy maternal figure, and ask why we judge her more harshly than we do many of her male counterparts. From bending rules for Harry to staying behind at Hogwarts under Death Eater control, McGonagall’s story is one of survival, restraint, and invisible labor—and maybe that’s a different kind of heroism altogether.
 
And a special thank-you to our newest Deep Divers on Patreon: Lynn, Molly, and CunningandCompassion. Your support means the world.

Welcome to Critical Magic Theory, where we deconstruct the Wizarding World of Harry Potter—because loving something doesn’t mean we can’t be critical of it.
 
This week’s Prof Response tackles one of our most emotional episodes to date: Remus Lupin. But before diving in, we confront a real-world reality—J.K. Rowling’s continued advocacy for trans-exclusionary laws and the heartbreak of deciding whether we can still use her text for good. Spoiler: we think we can. And we explain why.
 
From there, we wrestle with listener reflections on shame, love, and the monsters society creates—both literal and metaphorical. We discuss Fenrir Greyback as a disturbing allegory for institutional bias, analyze Lupin’s internalized fear, and ask hard questions about fatherhood, failure, and trying to be good in a world that tells you you’re not. This is a deep one. But it’s also a reminder of why this podcast—and this kind of critical thinking—matters.

Why didn’t Lupin ever write to Harry? Why did he run from Tonks? And how does someone who survives so much still feel like they deserve so little?

In this soul-stirring episode of Critical Magic Theory, Professor Julian Wamble peels back the layers of Remus Lupin—the beloved professor, the loyal Marauder, and the walking embodiment of internalized shame. Drawing from 700+ listener survey responses, Prof. Wamble explores how Lupin’s trauma, marginalization, and deep-rooted self-doubt shape not just his choices, but how we judge them. 

Stick around for a powerful final reflection that reframes Lupin not as a failure, but as a survivor—someone marked not by the moon, but by the shame a broken world handed him.
 
Special thanks to our newest Patreon Deep Divers: Gelsey, Kayla, Jeni, Mehrunissa, Sara! Thanks so much for your support and contributions to this community.

And don’t forget to join the post-episode chat on Patreon—because we’ve got to talk more about this one.

Be critical. Stay magical.

What if the biggest betrayal in the Wizarding World wasn’t just about evil—it was about never being seen in the first place?

In this episode chat of Critical Magic Theory, Professor Julian Wamble deep-dives into the fallout from “The Radacity of Peter Pettigrew” episode, reflecting on listener reactions and further complicating our understanding of one of Harry Potter’s most reviled characters. Was Peter a coward or a child soldier shaped by war? Did Sirius and James ever truly see him—or did their assumptions doom them all? With insights from listeners and meditations on victimhood, war, friendship hierarchies, and the symbolism of Peter’s Animagus form, this episode blends humor, reflection, and raw honesty. We challenge the notion that being seen as harmless makes someone good—and ask how often our desire to see the best in others blinds us to the truth.

Thirteen years hiding in plain sight. A friendship shattered beyond repair.  A betrayal so bold it rewrote the entire course of the wizarding war.

The question isn’t whether Peter Pettigrew had audacity—it’s where he found the ratdacity.

In this episode of Critical Magic Theory, we’re scurrying deep into the shadows of the Marauders’ messiest member. Was Peter just a coward—or was he a master strategist in rodent’s clothing? We’re talking betrayal, survival, fear-fueled loyalty, and what happens when your desire to matter eclipses your sense of morality. Plus: we unpack your survey responses, consider what makes a “good” Death Eater (yes, that’s a thing), and reflect on how the Pettigrews among us are closer than we think.
 
And a huge thank you to our newest Deep Divers on Patreon: Sophie, Ariel, and Tammy!

Your support means the world—and helps keep this community curious, thoughtful, and full of just the right amount of chaos.
 
As always, my friends— Be critical. Stay magical.

Can a villain be a good leader? Not if he’s noseless and narcissistic.

Welcome back to Critical Magic Theory, where we deconstruct the Wizarding World of Harry Potter—because loving something doesn’t mean we can’t be critical of it. In today’s Prof Responds episode, I’m diving deep into your post-episode thoughts on none other than the noseless wonder himself: Voldemort. Or, as some of us have started calling him… Voldiva.
 
We’re unpacking whether Voldemort was actually a good leader (spoiler: no), what his followers really wanted, and how Grindelwald might just be the evil mastermind Voldemort (and the D.E.s) wishes he was. We’re also talking narcissism, cosplay ideology, and what it means when your revolution is really just a glorified social club with masks.
 
Plus, I’m tackling your best comments—from snake oil salesman slander to whether Voldemort ever truly believed in his own cause.

And don’t worry: yes, the Peter Pettigrew survey is still live! If you haven’t filled it out yet, now’s your chance. Don’t let Wormtail down (or maybe do, I don’t know your life).
 
Be critical and stay magical.

Is this an episode of Real Housewives of the Wizarding World?

No, just an episode about ole Voldy V- the ultimate diva. From his obsession with power to his need for an audience at every major moment, we unpack how his insecurities, delusions, and over-the-top theatrics make him one of the most absurd villains in fiction.
 
We revisit the iconic graveyard scene, where Voldemort finally gets his body back—only to immediately fumble his own victory. We also break down whether he was actually a good leader to the Death Eaters (spoiler: he wasn’t) and explore why he tried so hard to erase his half-blood identity. The Arithmancy Lesson gave us some chaotic but insightful takes—some of you even compared his leadership style to an MLM, and honestly, the accuracy is scary.

Next Episode's Deep Dive: Wormtail
 
The survey drops on Patreon first, so be sure to weigh in. Speaking of Patreon, a special shoutout to our newest Patreon Deep Diver, Aurélie! Welcome to the club, and thank you for your support—it means the world!
 
If you’re not on Patreon yet, what are you waiting for? The chaos is happening there!

Until next time—be critical, stay magical.

In this lively and deeply engaging episode of Critical Magic Theory, Professor Julian Wamble responds to the fiery post-episode discussion about Tom Riddle. From dissecting the many hilarious and shady nicknames the CMT community bestowed upon Voldemort to unpacking the complexities of his insecurities, Julian dives deep into what makes Tom Riddle tick.
 
Topics range from the imposter syndrome and theatrics that defined Voldemort’s rise to power, to his surprising nostalgia for Hogwarts, and even the role of pretty privilege in his early manipulations. Plus, Julian tackles the thorny discourse around love potions, consent, and whether Voldemort’s “loveless” conception actually shaped his villainy.
 
With a signature mix of humor, insight, and beats to bop to, this Prof Responds episode is not one to miss—just make sure you’ve stretched before hitting play. And as always, the post-episode chat on Patreon is bound to be lit.

In this episode of Critical Magic Theory, we begin our deep dive into the origins of Lord Voldemort by unpacking the complexities of Tom Riddle Jr. Professor Julian Wamble explores what made young Tom tick—his ambitions, insecurities, and relentless desire to prove himself in the Wizarding World. Was he a textbook Slytherin, or did his ego ultimately undermine his ambitions? Is he a victim of his upbringing, or was his villainy inevitable?
 
From his desperate need for external validation to his obsession with rewriting his own identity, we trace the moments that shaped Tom Riddle into the Dark Lord. We also delve into psychological insights from a clinical psychologist, questioning whether he was truly a psychopath or simply a product of deep-seated trauma.
 
Join us as we challenge the myth of Voldemort’s self-confidence, analyze the sheer pettiness of his anagrammed name, and examine whether his master plan was ever as foolproof as he thought. And, of course, stay tuned for the next episode, where we transition from “Tommy J” to the fully transformed Voldemort, post-nose. 

A special thanks to our new Patreon Deep Divers- Molly, Samantha, Sam, Kathryn, Meena. 

With chaos, controversy, and critical insight, Professor Julian Wamble dives into the passionate post-episode discussion following the Pure-Blood Showdown episode. With the fandom in an uproar over Narcissa Malfoy being crowned Best Parent, Julian unpacks the arguments from Patreon listeners, exploring the biases and dynamics at play in how fans judge “good” and “bad” parenting in the Wizarding World. The conversation extends to the contentious Worst Son designation for Barty Crouch Jr., with Julian examining the complexities of his relationship with Barty Crouch Sr. and how parental expectations shape perceptions of character morality.
 
Shifting gears, a Half-Blood Primer is introduced, setting the stage for upcoming episodes on Voldemort and other half-blood characters. The discussion highlights the vast spectrum of half-blood identities in the Wizarding World, debunking misconceptions and emphasizing the nuanced ways heritage and socialization shape a wizard’s experience. 

BUST OUT YOUR YEARBOOKS!! It's time for the best and worst of the Purebloods! In this episode of Critical Magic Theory, we wrap up our epic 14-month journey through the world of pure bloods. We explore what it truly means to be a pureblood in the Wizarding World—unpacking the social constructs, privileges, and pressures that shape their identities. From the tension between external validation and unapologetic individuality to the insidious nature of pure blood supremacy, we dive deep into how these characters are socialized, perceived, and ultimately remembered.

Huge thanks to our Patreon Deep Divers—Carlisa, Carrie, Hannah, Aisling, Hannah L, and Ika—your support means the world!

Now, buckle up, because this one’s a wild ride!

In this special mini-episode of Critical Magic Theory, Professor Julian Wamble introduces a new segment: Prof Responds. This segment is designed to continue the discussion from the Patreon post-episode chat, allowing deeper engagement with listeners’ comments and insights.
 
The focus of this episode is Lavender Brown, exploring how race and gender intersect in the portrayal of her character. Professor Wamble examines the controversy surrounding Lavender’s race change in the Harry Potter films and the implications of representation, particularly how Black girls are often denied the carefree, “silly” portrayals that white teenage girls receive. 

The episode also touches on Lavender’s fate in the Battle of Hogwarts, questioning why she was chosen for such a violent and unsettling end at the hands of Fenrir Greyback. Wamble explores possible authorial intent behind this decision and its gendered implications.
 
A broader discussion emerges on what it means to be a “good” Pureblood, challenging the high moral expectations often placed on characters and the reality that most individuals in privileged groups may not be active in dismantling oppressive systems.

This conversation extends to the gendered nature of Gryffindor traits, questioning how courage and heroism in the series are often coded as masculine and how this affects perceptions of characters like Lavender and Hermione. 

Next up: a Chaotic ranking of the Best and Worst Purebloods!

Through a mix of critical analysis, and a healthy dose of chaos, Professor Wamble and Cassie (one of the Patreon “chronic overthinkers,”) reconsider Lavender Brown’s role in the series, her legacy, and what she can teach us about gendered expectations and internalized misogyny. They deep dive deep into the misunderstood and often maligned character of Lavender Brown asking- Why has the Harry Potter fandom been so hard on her? Is she truly as clingy and annoying as we’ve been conditioned to believe, or is she simply a teenage girl unapologetically embracing her emotions in a world that punishes femininity? Together, we unpack the fandom’s biases, J.K. Rowling’s problematic portrayal of female characters, and why Lavender might actually be the perfect girlfriend for Ron—if only he had been emotionally ready. Special thanks to our newly minted Patreon Deep Divers: Lee, Elise, Lisa, Ingrid, Sana, Beth, Amber, Mackenzie! Thanks so much for your support!! 

TW: DV and SA are discussed in this episode.

Can a villain also be a victim? Embark on a journey through the layered narrative of Merope Gaunt, the enigmatic mother of Voldemort, as we mark one year of Critical Magic Theory. Merope's contentious life story, shaped by a web of abuse and desperation, invites a deeper examination of the societal and family dynamics that molded her path.

In this episode, we scrutinize Merope's struggle for empowerment against the backdrop of a turbulent family life, drawing parallels to Harry Potter's own hardships. With a focus on her role as a mother and a pureblood, we confront the challenging dichotomy of victimhood and villainy, exploring whether her circumstances justify her controversial decisions.

A special thanks to the new Patreon Deep Divers: 
Alysha, Nia, Cassandra, Daphne, and Millicent 

Join us as we unpack the paradoxical realities of the Gaunt family in the Harry Potter universe. Discover how Marvolo and Morfin Gaunt's fierce dedication to their bloodline leads to a toxic supremacy that survives despite their poverty and lack of societal advantages. This episode promises to uncover the complex dynamics that set the stage for Merope Gaunt's tragic story, which we will explore in the next episode.

In our exploration, we contrast the Gaunts with other notable families like the Malfoys and Weasleys, examining how financial standing and status influence their actions and beliefs. By comparing the Gaunts' aggressive brand of supremacy with the more calculated fanaticism of families like the Malfoys, we gain deeper insights into the interplay between lineage, ideology, and power. We also investigate the Gaunts' dark legacy and its profound impact on Merope and her son, Tom Riddle Jr.

A special thanks to our  new Patreon Deep Divers: 

• Adrian
• Sarah
• Mary-Margaret
• Meghan
• Virginia
• Sh
• Brycipoo
• Ashley

What if you could navigate life with unapologetic authenticity? Discover how Luna Lovegood exemplifies this bold approach, as we explore her fascinating character from the Harry Potter series. In this latest episode,  you'll gain insights into Luna's remarkable ability to be herself, challenging societal norms and inspiring self-acceptance. We delve into Luna's placement in Ravenclaw House and speculate on her blood status while reflecting on her role as a standout character introduced later in the series. Join us as we discuss how she captures the hearts of fans and invites listeners to reconsider their own perspectives.

Luna Lovegood's brutal honesty and unconventional kindness take center stage as we celebrate her unique approach to life. Her candid insights, often overlooked by her peers, offer refreshing truths that encourage introspection and confront societal issues. Her ability to connect with others through kindness, even when facing adversity, reveals the depth of her character as a beacon of support for those who feel unseen or misunderstood.

MERCH