Predicting how hard an exam question will be for human test-takers — without running expensive human trials — would transform educational assessment. This paper proposes using the reasoning traces of large language models as a proxy for human cognitive effort. Rather than treating these traces as raw text, Epi2Diff structures them into meaningful "cognitive episodes" — functional states like planning, implementing, and verifying — and uses the dynamics between these states to predict difficulty. Tested on four real-world human difficulty datasets including SAT-derived benchmarks, it consistently outperforms strong baselines. Applications include automated test construction, adaptive learning platforms, and AI-assisted item difficulty calibration for standardized assessments.
Authors: Chenguang Wang, Ming Li, Xinyue Zeng, Zhuochun Li, Hong Jiao, Tianyi Zhou, Dawei Zhou
Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.28186v1
Fler avsnitt av Eye on AI Weekly Research Watch
Visa alla avsnitt av Eye on AI Weekly Research WatchEye on AI Weekly Research Watch med Craig Spencer Smith finns tillgänglig på flera plattformar. Informationen på denna sida kommer från offentliga podd-flöden.
