Start / Iowa Type Theory Commute / Why cut elimination is more complicated than normalization

Iowa Type Theory Commute

Why Cut Elimination is More Complicated than Normalization

12 min • 5 oktober 2021

Cut elimination for sequent calculus is more involved that normalization of detours for natural deduction.  There are more cases of cuts that must be transformed than correspond to detours (introductions followed by eliminations).  In this episode, I explain why that is.

Senaste avsnitt

Correction: the Correct Author of the Proof from Last Episode, and an AI flop

12 maj | 7 min

Krivine's Proof of FD, Using Intersection Types

5 maj | 22 min

A Measure-Based Proof of Finite Developments

16 april | 23 min

Introduction to the Finite Developments Theorem

27 mars | 16 min

Nominal Isabelle/HOL

31 januari | 16 min
Vad är en podd?

En liten tjänst av I'm With Friends. Finns även på engelska.

Podcastbild

00:00 -00:00
00:00 -00:00