We recently published our paper on "Measuring Reward-Seeking via Contrastive Belief Updates". We're excited about research like this, and there are many more open problems than we can work on. Here's a list of open problems that we think are valuable.
If you work on/solve these problems, we'd be happy to signal-boost your research. If your next research project is one of these problems, feel free to reach out to [email protected] to discuss it in more detail.
Reward-Seeking and its Implications
1. Is a Reward-Seeking Model more difficult to align?
The strongest case for expecting reduced "train-time corrigibility" due to reward-seeking, applies to Instrumental Reward-Seeking, where the model actively reasons "I will please oversight now, in order to accomplish some other thing later". Alignment training a model like that may update its beliefs about graders and oversight, without reshaping its underlying values.
Current forms of reward-seeking are likely better understood as terminal, i.e. models try to please the grader without ulterior motives. There is likely a continuous spectrum between Terminal and Instrumental Reward-Seeking. Thus, we can hopefully study the effects that mostly Terminal Reward-Seeking has on train-time corrigibility now, in the hopes of learning about the effects that Instrumental [...]
---
Outline:
(00:43) Reward-Seeking and its Implications
(00:47) 1. Is a Reward-Seeking Model more difficult to align?
(02:20) 2. Can we measure Instrumental Reward-Seeking?
(03:25) 3. When does Reward-Seeking most increase / decrease?
(04:50) 4. Are there better Belief Update Techniques than SDF?
(07:06) Improving SDF
(07:10) 5. Can AIs detect the difference between pretraining facts and SDF facts?
(07:49) 6. How is SDF different from changing pretraining?
(09:32) 7. Does SDF have off-target effects?
(11:29) 8. SDF sometimes generalizes in surprising ways
(12:31) 9. Getting good synthetic document recall is finicky
(14:11) Better Validation Techniques
(14:23) 10. Our model organisms could be more robust
(15:32) 11. Can we get more bits of information for ground-truth?
The original text contained 1 footnote which was omitted from this narration.
---
First published:
July 21st, 2026
Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/8wXRuHQqCbRsbap6q/11-open-empirical-problems-in-reward-seeking
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
---
Images from the article:
Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.
Fler avsnitt av LessWrong (30+ Karma)
Visa alla avsnitt av LessWrong (30+ Karma)LessWrong (30+ Karma) med LessWrong finns tillgänglig på flera plattformar. Informationen på denna sida kommer från offentliga podd-flöden.
