LessWrong (30+ Karma)

“Claude 4 You: Safety and Alignment” by Zvi

119 min • 25 maj 2025

Unlike everyone else, Anthropic actually Does (Some of) the Research. That means they report all the insane behaviors you can potentially get their models to do, what causes those behaviors, how they addressed this and what we can learn. It is a treasure trove. And then they react reasonably, in this case imposing their ASL-3 safeguards on Opus 4. That's right, Opus. We are so back.

Yes, there are some rather troubling behaviors that Opus can do if given the proper provocations. If you tell it to ‘take initiative,’ hook it up to various tools, and then tell it to fabricate the data for a pharmaceutical study or build a bioweapon or what not, or fooling Opus into thinking that's what you are doing, it might alert the authorities or try to cut off your access. And That's Terrible, completely not intended behavior, we agree it shouldn’t do [...]

---

Outline:

(03:44) Introducing Claude 4 Opus and Claude 4 Sonnet

(06:08) Activate Safety Level Three

(08:17) The Spirit of the RSP

(09:46) An Abundance of Caution

(10:34) Okay What Are These ASL-3 Precautions

(16:55) How Annoying Will This ASL-3 Business Be In Practice?

(18:34) Overview Of The Safety Testing Process

(20:12) False Negatives On Single-Turn Requests

(20:39) False Positives on Single-Turn Requests

(21:33) Ambiguous Requests and Multi-Turn Testing.

(22:21) Child Safety

(22:55) Political Sycophancy and Discrimination

(25:46) Agentic Safety Against Misuse

(26:54) Alignment

(27:40) The Clearly Good News

(30:40) Reasoning Faithfulness Remains Unchanged

(31:47) Self-Preservation Attempts

(44:12) High Agency Behavior

(01:10:37) Oh Now You Demand Labs Take Responsibility For Their Models

(01:18:32) In The Beginning The Universe Was Created, This Made a Lot Of People Very Angry And Has Been Widely Regarded as a Bad Move

(01:30:52) Erratic Behavior and Stated Goals in Testing

(01:36:43) Situational Awareness

(01:37:11) Insufficiently Mostly Harmless Due To Then-Omitted Data

(01:40:15) Apollo Evaluation

(01:43:36) Model Welfare

(01:48:50) The RSP Evaluations and ASL Classifications

(01:55:22) Pobody's Nerfect

(01:56:54) Danger, And That's Good Actually

---

First published:
May 25th, 2025

Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/PjeZxCivuoyKhs4JB/claude-4-you-safety-and-alignment

---

Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

---

Images from the article:

Screenshot of Claude declining to respond due to policy violation.
White text on black background:
Search bar showing query
Table comparing attack prevention scores for three Claude models with/without safeguards.
Table comparing refusal rates for three Claude models, titled
Table showing harmful behavior percentages for Claude Sonnet 3.7 and Opus 4.
Table mapping ASL-3 Deployment Standard criteria to corresponding security measures.
Terminal window showing API requests and urgent FDA compliance report about ZMS-700.
Bar graph showing
Table comparing harmless response rates for four Claude models under different thinking modes.
Bar graph titled
Two tables showing bias and accuracy scores for Claude language models: BBQ evaluation
Table titled
Table showing StrongREJECT jailbreak resistance scores for three Claude models.

Performance comparison table showing benchmark scores for various AI language models.

The table compares Claude Opus 4, Claude Sonnet 4, Claude Sonnet 3.7, OpenAI o3, GPT-4.1, and Gemini 2.5 Pro across different evaluation metrics including coding, reasoning, and math capabilities.
Simple cartoon emoji showing person shrugging in purple shirt.
White lighter with an orange flame burning on top.
White lighter with an orange flame burning on top.

Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.

Senaste avsnitt

Podcastbild

00:00 -00:00
00:00 -00:00