“Debate experiments at The Curve, LessOnline and Manifest” by Nathan Young
I like debate. I have done for years. So I have been slowly trying to improve it. Here is a set of theories I had and things, experiments I've run so far.
Theory: Any debates are good.
Are any debates actually good at all? Should I give up?
Test: Watch different debates.
Evidence: I much prefer some debates to others.
Good debates:
- Dr. Richard Carrier andDr. Michael Licona. I like how they chat to one another.
- Destiny and Ben Shapiro. I recall liking this one. I remember them as having good chemistry.
- Jubilee's “Surrounded” debates. I love an experimental format and these get a lot of different arguments in a short amount of time[1].
Bad debates:
- Finkelstein, Destiny and M. Rabbani & Benny Morris. Long and acrimonious. I think Lex Fridman is deeply guilty of the “I’ll just let them talk it out” school of debate. I [...]
---
Outline:
(00:23) Theory: Any debates are good.
(02:24) Theory: The format is the problem.
(02:34) Theory: Debates are bad because debaters focus on their own status.
(06:59) Current top theory: A good investigator is best
(07:55) Other theories I may test later
(09:05) One more thing..
The original text contained 5 footnotes which were omitted from this narration.
---
First published:
June 13th, 2025
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
Senaste avsnitt
En liten tjänst av I'm With Friends. Finns även på engelska.