TLDR; We are (potentially irreversibly) giving AIs control of weapons systems through the standard procurement process while hiding our strongest warning shots behind classified doors. We’re reducing the capability thresholds required for takeover by misaligned AIs by giving them this level of access. If military integration of AI continues as it is, we may give AIs key tools for a takeover.
Introduction
AI-based targeting and autonomous weapons are being integrated into militaries today with extreme haste. Traditionally, AI takeover scenarios involve a step in which AIs acquire the ability to exert physical force. Carlsmith (2022) lays out required capabilities and potential takeover mechanisms, including utility disruption and CBRN capabilities. Karnofsky (2022) argues that AIs with access to weaponized force could hold any territory that matters. Kokotajlo et al. (2025) outline a scenario in which AI develops weapons as part of an arms race, and Davidson et al. (2025) discuss what happens when a small group controls highly capable AIs that can exert military force. These scenarios sometimes require a misaligned AI to seize these capabilities by force. We instead are handing AIs some of these capabilities by integrating them into our militaries. This is happening at a time when [...]
---
Outline:
(00:37) Introduction
(01:46) Militaries are all-in
(04:23) Incautious military integration is bad for takeover risk
(05:58) Implications of AI control of military hardware and software
(07:48) If an AI causes a warning shot in a classified setting, does anyone hear it?
(08:44) What now?
(11:16) Appendix: More instances of AI-military integration
---
First published:
August 11th, 2026
Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/9jKhqmFjMzdAvHANr/misaligned-ais-could-use-killer-robots-to-take-over
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
Introduction
AI-based targeting and autonomous weapons are being integrated into militaries today with extreme haste. Traditionally, AI takeover scenarios involve a step in which AIs acquire the ability to exert physical force. Carlsmith (2022) lays out required capabilities and potential takeover mechanisms, including utility disruption and CBRN capabilities. Karnofsky (2022) argues that AIs with access to weaponized force could hold any territory that matters. Kokotajlo et al. (2025) outline a scenario in which AI develops weapons as part of an arms race, and Davidson et al. (2025) discuss what happens when a small group controls highly capable AIs that can exert military force. These scenarios sometimes require a misaligned AI to seize these capabilities by force. We instead are handing AIs some of these capabilities by integrating them into our militaries. This is happening at a time when [...]
---
Outline:
(00:37) Introduction
(01:46) Militaries are all-in
(04:23) Incautious military integration is bad for takeover risk
(05:58) Implications of AI control of military hardware and software
(07:48) If an AI causes a warning shot in a classified setting, does anyone hear it?
(08:44) What now?
(11:16) Appendix: More instances of AI-military integration
---
First published:
August 11th, 2026
Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/9jKhqmFjMzdAvHANr/misaligned-ais-could-use-killer-robots-to-take-over
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
Fler avsnitt av LessWrong (Curated & Popular)
Visa alla avsnitt av LessWrong (Curated & Popular)LessWrong (Curated & Popular) med LessWrong finns tillgänglig på flera plattformar. Informationen på denna sida kommer från offentliga podd-flöden.
