In this episode, we continue our discussion of disagreement in science, shifting the conversation from why it matters to how to do it well.
Shownotes
- Paul Graham. (2008). How to disagree.
- Rapoport's Rules.
- Cass Sunstien. The Rapoport Rules.
- Preregistration is redundant, at best.
- An Evidence-Based Critique of the Cass Review
- Fiedler, K., Messner, C., & Bluemke, M. (2006). Unresolved problems with the “I”, the “A”, and the “T”: A logical and psychometric critique of the Implicit Association Test (IAT). European Review of Social Psychology, 17(1), 74–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280600681248
- Neyman, J. (1961). Silver Jubilee of My Dispute With Fisher. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 3, 145–154.
Fler avsnitt av Nullius in Verba
Visa alla avsnitt av Nullius in VerbaNullius in Verba med Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens finns tillgänglig på flera plattformar. Informationen på denna sida kommer från offentliga podd-flöden.
